Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 16:42:01 +0100 (CET) From: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> To: dick@tar.com (Richard Seaman Jr.) Cc: grog@lemis.com (Greg Lehey), current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Breaking DMA support for multiple chipsets? (was: HEADSUP: wd driver will be retired!) Message-ID: <199912091542.QAA90420@freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <19991209093436.A782@tar.com> from "Richard Seaman Jr." at "Dec 9, 1999 09:34:36 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems Richard Seaman Jr. wrote: > > > > It already being tested, and it works, but at the same tike I found > > out that the code in the old driver for the sis is schizofrenic, it > > has one way of setting things up, and another way of reporting how > > it is set :(, that way it is difficult to compare results from > > the two drivers.. > > I think the old wd code was broken on reporting. The reporting > was changed from the original submission, when it was committed. Yep, but it does mean that people _belive_ they are running UDMA where in fact they aren't, and now they blaim the ata driver for doing worse :( I'm not sure the other values reported are valid either as they are reported differently from what they are set to.... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912091542.QAA90420>