Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 16:39:38 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Bruno =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lauz=E9?= <brunolauze@msn.com> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: wbem, cim and instrumentation Message-ID: <20140507143938.GB2341@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <BLU179-W47420B2601981CBE65DEA2C64E0@phx.gbl> References: <BLU179-W47420B2601981CBE65DEA2C64E0@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > One thing I feel FreeBSD always ignored is instrumentation frameworks. > I am talking about wbem, cim model and implementation like OpenPegasus. Why is that? > I ported OpenPegasus to work in FreeBSD with few patches. > github.com/brunolauze/openpegasus-providers > > my openpegasus port is at: > > github.com/brunolauze/freebsd-ports/tree/master/net-mgmt/openpegasus So, getting this committed to FreeBSD ports is your goal ? > Why not us? Dunno 8-} > Anyway, this is just to talk, let me know your opinions! I'll have a look. Not soon, not fast, but I'll have a look at it. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140507143938.GB2341>