Date: Mon, 7 Aug 95 11:18:59 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) To: tom@uniserve.com (Tom Samplonius) Cc: swallace@eng.uci.edu, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bare bones kernel Message-ID: <9508071719.AA26037@cs.weber.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950806181802.673C-100000@haven.uniserve.com> from "Tom Samplonius" at Aug 6, 95 06:19:33 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > On Sun, 6 Aug 1995, Steven Wallace wrote: > > > > > > > Could someone explain to me why you must have "options FFS" and > > > > > > A kernel without a filesystem? That won't work. > > > > How about a kernel with a non-VFS file system? > > That would be a nice party trick, but would removing all those > dependencies really be worth it? It's all of two files, plus the cruft in the struct file that needs to die anyway, since it's the wrong way to support UNIX (POSIX) domain sockets in the first place. Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9508071719.AA26037>