Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 16:28:23 +0800 (WITA) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: 3eb30c6af392 - main - archivers/lzip: Update to 1.26 Message-ID: <8e59e40f-60a7-fce8-5c63-dbfb0ab2db20@pfeifer.com> In-Reply-To: <b2410c7b-2c67-450b-993e-65204dce0c39@FreeBSD.org> References: <69c0108c.245b4.7db0716c@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <22b341c6-308a-418b-b588-1cc888116c21@FreeBSD.org> <6c7700b2-8665-46be-7249-02cd57d8044b@pfeifer.com> <b2410c7b-2c67-450b-993e-65204dce0c39@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sun, 22 Mar 2026, Daniel Engberg wrote:
>> How did you notice this? Good eyes! (Was it the warning in configure
>> stage?)
> Release archive looked suspiciously small for Autotools without USES=
> autoreconf :)
Hah, definitely a strong indicator, yes.
> It needs something like:
>
> CONFIGURE_ARGS= --prefix="${LOCALBASE}" \
It was --prefix="${PREFIX}" in my testing (which I generally do with
PREFIX != LOCALBASE).
> CXX="${CXX}" \
> CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS}" \
> LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}"
These I could drop in my tests, though clearly things aren't passed
onwards then, so I kept it as is.
Thanks for pointing this out, and sorry it took me a bit to push the
change.
Gerald
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8e59e40f-60a7-fce8-5c63-dbfb0ab2db20>