Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:20:27 +0300 From: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Cc: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>, ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 36c21f98ff44 - main - benchmarks/ttcp: Update to 1.13 Message-ID: <CALH631mWdsknMr3ab9Cwkcn-j9ddS%2Bt00_WqpyeiCrHpfpE1cw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <vihvepbk5lowe2jhfd6tts2rt6tshimet6nezuc5dcyxahfxbg@zhwzl2pwo476> References: <202402240847.41O8lN0C026751@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <c3ddafc7035aca09ed4be08afec4baec@mail.infomaniak.com> <CALH631kKRuT89gUqr8mbjNuZ5KUy5wqpSA5hmbY3qbLxxDoxxA@mail.gmail.com> <e6da26b9f5e9efc7a97a553c70e35565@mail.infomaniak.com> <CALH631kRw3zYpOBTBM6mr1Ozrf5LSa2CimaKd3YP4fVP4TTifg@mail.gmail.com> <vihvepbk5lowe2jhfd6tts2rt6tshimet6nezuc5dcyxahfxbg@zhwzl2pwo476>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024, 11:00 Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 03:37:47PM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 3:34 PM Daniel Engberg
> > <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > URL(s) for how we fetch releases/archives from Codeberg
> >
> > Ah, sorry, I just wasn't aware we're standardizing on this. Out of
> > curiosity, what's the rationale behind the
> >
> "${ACCOUNTNAME}/${PROJECTNAME}/archive/${DISTVERSIONFULL}${EXTRACT_SUFX}?dummy=/"
> > form? Why the current form is bad?
>
> The rationale with having the ?dummy=/ at the end is to trick fetch into
> creating a file with a unique name.
>
> --
> Mathieu Arnold
>
I know that, but the change in question does not affect DISTNAME anyways. I
guess, Daniel's concern is about URL components?
>
[-- Attachment #2 --]
<div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Feb 26, 2024, 11:00 Mathieu Arnold <<a href="mailto:mat@freebsd.org">mat@freebsd.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 03:37:47PM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote:<br>
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 3:34 PM Daniel Engberg<br>
> <<a href="mailto:daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Hi,<br>
> ><br>
> > URL(s) for how we fetch releases/archives from Codeberg<br>
> <br>
> Ah, sorry, I just wasn't aware we're standardizing on this. Out of<br>
> curiosity, what's the rationale behind the<br>
> "${ACCOUNTNAME}/${PROJECTNAME}/archive/${DISTVERSIONFULL}${EXTRACT_SUFX}?dummy=/"<br>
> form? Why the current form is bad?<br>
<br>
The rationale with having the ?dummy=/ at the end is to trick fetch into<br>
creating a file with a unique name.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Mathieu Arnold<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I know that, but the change in question does not affect DISTNAME anyways. I guess, Daniel's concern is about URL components? </div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div></div></div>
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631mWdsknMr3ab9Cwkcn-j9ddS%2Bt00_WqpyeiCrHpfpE1cw>
