Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:24:33 +0100 (CET) From: Georg Klein <backspace@freenet.de> To: ay@sita.kiev.ua Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability Message-ID: <20021217212018.H776-100000@newton.gkln.net> In-Reply-To: <200212171502.gBHF2MN85548@sima.sita.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 ay@sita.kiev.ua wrote: > In article <20021217022222.GA42831@kzsu.stanford.edu.lucky.freebsd.questions> you wrote: > > Hey, one of my acquaintences is running a 2.2.8-STABLE box > > which had 1048 days of uptime as of 32 days ago. I bet it's > > still up... > > :) > Is it ok to still run this security hole called 2.2.* ? > :) > -- It's ok. it's better than following this windoze hype that you always have to run the latest version. It makes the quality of an OS, that you dont have always to run the latest release. How many sites are still running Solaris 2.6? And - a lttle fun must be! -Georg -- Georg Klein backspace@freenet.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021217212018.H776-100000>