Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 20:58:28 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/nightfall Makefile ports/benchmarks/himenobench Makefile ports/benchmarks/hpl Makefile ports/biology/molden Makefile ports/biology/ortep3 Makefile ports/biology/platon Makefile ports/biology/psi88 Makefile ports/biology/tinker ... Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.1.99.0901081120010.12007@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <1231403223.51790.138.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <200901071634.n07GYRXK032137@repoman.freebsd.org> <4965494A.6070803@FreeBSD.org> <1231403223.51790.138.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Because all the fortran code must be recompiled against new and > incompatible fortran library. Yep. Strictly speaking, only ports with USE_FORTRAN=yes that depend on some other port that has USE_FORTRAN=yes, or ports with USE_FORTRAN=yes which some other port that has USE_FORTRAN=yes depends on would have needed the bump (modulo potential additional "manual" dependencies). I believe we do not have a reasonable way to determine such a cover, and all those OPTIONS and knobs make this even more tricky. And the result likely would have been pretty close to the full set anyway... Gerald -- Gerald (Jerry) Pfeifer gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LSU.1.99.0901081120010.12007>