Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:45:36 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To: "Gary T. Corcoran" <gcorcoran@lucent.com>
Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [NEWCARD] pcic_handle in pcic_{enable,disable}_socket]
Message-ID: <200004130245.UAA42367@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:16:59 EDT." <38F52E1B.8D418F55@lucent.com>
References: <38F52E1B.8D418F55@lucent.com> <38F41E0C.7F912BDF@home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <38F52E1B.8D418F55@lucent.com> "Gary T. Corcoran" writes: : Yes, the "ISA" range of ports is 0 to 0x3FF, and 0x00-0xFF are reserved : for motherboard devices. Conventional wisdom says that normally : standard built-in devices also use the 0x100-0x1FF range. Therefore, : add in cards/devices for "ISA" should only use the 0x200-0x3FF range, : to be safe... The NetBSD code tried to be more agressive about port allocation, but found that it had to restrict itself to the range you talk about as being safe. We'll follow that lead, since it is likely the best that can be hoped for. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004130245.UAA42367>