Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:51:19 +0100 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Tobias Roth <roth@iam.unibe.ch> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The case for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20050209175119.GC82324@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20050209163317.GA24282@droopy.unibe.ch> References: <20050209145329.GA27679@wirehub.nl> <20050209152511.62367.qmail@web26801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <20050209154131.GA24122@droopy.unibe.ch> <50141.208.4.77.66.1107965096.squirrel@208.4.77.66> <20050209163317.GA24282@droopy.unibe.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If they would have tried the other direction (ie, FreeBSD ports/init system > with a Linux based system), I would applaud as well. This killer combo for > everyone who wants/needs a Linux kernel would instantly wipe out all other > general purpose GNU/Linux distributions. I don't want to troll, but while we are in the area of using packaging system on non-native platforms, I think NetBSD's pkgsrc [1] must be presented. It was designed to be highly portable accross platforms (it just even runs on Windows as far as I heard). (I didn't read the whole thread, so maybe someone already presented it.) Regards, [1] http://www.pkgsrc.org/ -- Jeremie Le Hen jeremie at le-hen dot org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050209175119.GC82324>