Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:14:37 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@FreeBSD.org>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r192800 - in head/sys: cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys cddl/contrib/opensolaris/common/acl cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs cddl/contrib/opensolaris/u... Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905262114090.23177@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20090526200925.GA41682@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <200905260822.n4Q8M0Zv051280@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905261126560.23177@fledge.watson.org> <9bbcef730905260624x289af079ue8524e821c1dc891@mail.gmail.com> <20090526200925.GA41682@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> Cute though this BSD license variation is, I'm pretty sure it's not on the >>> approved license list. ??Sticking to the standard license templates >>> potentially saves significant trouble later -- especially when people >> >> Hmm, I'm sure that there exists some SVN magic which would allow authors to >> enter something >> >> $BSDL2 Charlie Root 2008,2009$ >> >> and it expands to a perfect boilerplate on checkout :) > > Such a change would result in a repository filled without license blocks. > This might be appropriate in a corporate setting, but isn't worth > considering here since copies of the repo would lack correct attributions. I'd assumed that it was a tongue-in-cheek proposal, myself :-). (It is, right?) Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0905262114090.23177>