Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 12:50:01 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r226162 - head/share/mk Message-ID: <20111008195001.GA77379@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <4E90A5D4.9020006@FreeBSD.org> References: <201110081825.p98IP22D073560@svn.freebsd.org> <4E90A5D4.9020006@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 12:34:44PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 10/08/2011 11:25, Chris Rees wrote: > > Author: crees (ports committer) > > Date: Sat Oct 8 18:25:01 2011 > > New Revision: 226162 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226162 > > > > Log: > > Revert unapproved commit to bsd.port.mk. > > This is completely unacceptable. We don't do "commit wars" in FreeBSD. FWIW, I completely agree with Doug, which is a rare event. The original commit message included This commit should be reverted when there is a cleaner fix in autotools and/or ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk. Chris, it appears that you did not commit a cleaner fix. You also seem to have omitted the "Approved by", "Reviewed by", and/or "Discussed on" line in your commit message. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111008195001.GA77379>