Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:44:47 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Mikolaj Golub <trociny@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r232317 - in head: . sys/kern sys/sys Message-ID: <14D2BDEC-B9C7-4B2D-AF2C-60598CCE1EBF@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <201202292138.q1TLcVFv046104@svn.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 29. Feb 2012, at 21:38 , Mikolaj Golub wrote: > Author: trociny > Date: Wed Feb 29 21:38:31 2012 > New Revision: 232317 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/232317 > > Log: > Introduce VOP_UNP_BIND(), VOP_UNP_CONNECT(), and VOP_UNP_DETACH() > operations for setting and accessing vnode's v_socket field. > > The operations are necessary to implement proper unix socket handling > on layered file systems like nullfs(5). > > This change fixes the long standing issue with nullfs(5) being in that > unix sockets did not work between lower and upper layers: if we bound > to a socket on the lower layer we could connect only to the lower > path; if we bound to the upper layer we could connect only to the > upper path. The new behavior is one can connect to both the lower and > the upper paths regardless what layer path one binds to. At this point I wonder if jhb has added (enough) spares with an earlier MFC of another change or whether we'll break thing again? > > PR: kern/51583, kern/159663 > Suggested by: kib > Reviewed by: arch > MFC after: 2 weeks -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14D2BDEC-B9C7-4B2D-AF2C-60598CCE1EBF>