Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 08:00:40 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> Cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org, iwasaki@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff? Message-ID: <20030320160040.GA67630@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303201051490.24221@scribble.fsn.hu> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303191332050.12646-100000@root.org> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303201051490.24221@scribble.fsn.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:58:20AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: > Hello, > > > It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there > > are a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current. > > Could someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for > > testing? If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be > > nice to have an import before 5.1R > > http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/CHANGES.txt > I can -at least- report one problem with the current ACPI code. When > loaded, the kernel freezes right after > APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery > > When I unset the acpi_load variable (so I don't load ACPI) it works. > Do you have "option MAXMEM" set in your kernel config file? I had a similar problem and discovered that the MAXMEM setting and acpi's idea of the memory in the system were slightly different. The is on the order of 1 kB. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030320160040.GA67630>