Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:44:36 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Vlad Galu <dudu@dudu.ro> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: High Network Perfomance Message-ID: <4E3C0FE4.2080200@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BFTnKOgDUG4tB9Rg5JJ4E4mfEfbN%2B186ztTnWwReD476nRcOw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANpwN=ticS53Z43rWVbtDU18cRtWH6sOE%2BfhJaS4LenTfZ=gpg@mail.gmail.com> <20110805002732.GA5340@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <201108051628.19884.pieter@degoeje.nl> <20110805145626.GB13217@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <4E3C0651.9070307@FreeBSD.org> <CA%2BFTnKN_dT2-y%2BOZHZV5TPKRb8oE8VOAVK__J-1dY1syxcQDvA@mail.gmail.com> <4E3C0D9E.40303@FreeBSD.org> <CA%2BFTnKOgDUG4tB9Rg5JJ4E4mfEfbN%2B186ztTnWwReD476nRcOw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 05/08/2011 18:40 Vlad Galu said the following: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: >> on 05/08/2011 18:23 Vlad Galu said the following: >>> Netmap's scope may be narrow, but it's a great alternative to >>> proprietary implementations that are provided by only a handful of >>> vendors and tied to their hardware. I don't think Luigi foresees lots >>> of users either, but having it in the base system is a lot better than >>> not having it at all, IMHO. >> >> No doubt. >> >> On the other hand, it was a little bit misleading of Luigi to suggest netmap to a >> user who merely asked about tuning FreeBSD network (routing/firewall) performance :-) >> >> netmap can no doubt be useful, but perhaps let's not overhype it before it >> actually proves itself on practical tasks. Or has it already? I might have >> missed that. > > It's great for IDS/IPS, which is exactly what I'm using it for :) Oh, yes, haven't thought about this. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E3C0FE4.2080200>