Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:43:37 +0100 From: ".VWV." <victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it> To: <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Re: Daemon's Advocate article Message-ID: <001101c3ffad$75a50540$7a30fea9@workstation> References: <20040229222159.GA47191@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20040301080337.Q67649@gwdu60.gwdg.de> <20040229233532.D44668@snafu.adept.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
---- Original Message ---- From: "Mike Hoskins" <mike@adept.org> To: <advocacy@freebsd.org> Sent: Monday, 01 March, 2004 08:38 Subject: Re: Daemon's Advocate article >On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Konrad Heuer wrote: >> Only the very very few ones regretting that Linux has gone this way and >> really liking open source will give FreeBSD a chance. > > i regret where linux has gone, at least distros like RH. but you are > correct, a lot of datacenters are filled with RH instead of *BSD. some of > it's application support, but with emulation as it is, a lot of it is just > hype. i love the simplicity (buildworld isn't hard) of FreeBSD and the > control that it gives you. it is stable, fast, etc... but i guess we get > back to the old "VHS vs. Betamax" debate. people often choose inferior > technology with their pocketbooks -- something very frustrating as an > engineer. > > -m What I miss, as an end user, is only a VMWare release making FreeBSD the hosting o.s. .VWV.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001101c3ffad$75a50540$7a30fea9>