Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:37:56 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: libncurses XOR libncursesw in base Message-ID: <20140416173756.GA24311@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline What would it take to switch all the remaining users of libncurses to libncursesw? I'm not suggesting removing libncurses, just avoiding it in base. The relatively recent switch to require libncursesw for vi is a minor pain on small embedded systems. I had attempted to work around this with WITHOUT_NCURSESW since vi already had an option for /rescue support but that's been broken in two separate ways in the couple months since I merged it a couple months ago. I don't understand the issues with switching the libraries well enough to just do it, but would be happy to do the work if they are explained. -- Brooks --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iKYEARECAGYFAlNOv/RfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDY1NUQ1MTlDMjZBNzgyRTcyNTI5OUJGMDVE OEU4QkU5RjIzODFBRDQACgkQXY6L6fI4GtSO7QCfZoRSRFzBkx9D38dsDR7LU+cp NHkAoM5POLr0Z+KtVSwEWOnP99CgVRlm =PzSW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140416173756.GA24311>