Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:47:46 +0100 From: Gregory Nou <gregorynou@altern.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Question on IFF_PPROMISC (and IFF_PROMISC) Message-ID: <43DA1672.1080609@altern.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I found a (somewhat old) post from gnn@ on this topic there : http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/net/2004-09/0289.html I also think that it would be a good idea to do it (at least, it would be easier to understand, because IFF_PPROMISC is not that explicit). If nobody has already done it, I'll work on this. There is another point on which I would appreciate to know your opinion: referring to if.c[1269], I understand that if IFF_PPROMISC is set in ifp->if_flags, IFF_PROMISC should be set to (or we are in a transient situation). It appears that if_ethersubr.c[652] is working in this case. Isn't it a mistake ? Thanks a lot ! -- Gregory (Forwarded here, because I got no answers on freebsd-net@)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43DA1672.1080609>