Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:16:36 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc Message-ID: <19990228151636.C2170@relay.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902281758160.406-100000@culverk.student.umd.edu>; from Kenneth Wayne Culver on Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 05:59:08PM -0500 References: <31170.920242197@zippy.cdrom.com> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902281758160.406-100000@culverk.student.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 05:59:08PM -0500, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > This is interesting, what makes egcs better than gcc? just a dumb > question. I agree with Jordan though: no pain no gain. :-) IMHO, maintence. EGCS is actively being developed. Gcc 2.8.x might be, but it is hard to see. Also Jeff Law of the EGCS steering committee, has said that FSF is heavily leaning on GNU GCC 2.9 (or 2.8.2) being some branch along the EGCS tree. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990228151636.C2170>