Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 2 Aug 2009 20:58:14 +0100
From:      "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com>, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r195960 - in head/sys/dev/usb: . controller input
Message-ID:  <134A728D-F2F4-4951-81D8-704CC2DB6F9F@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090802192902.GS47463@elvis.mu.org>
References:  <200907300014.n6U0EZ77086341@svn.freebsd.org> <d04e16b70907310045y635245efob33b10464c22524f@mail.gmail.com> <20090731212140.GK47463@elvis.mu.org> <200908010615.02972.hselasky@c2i.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0908012313500.1507@fledge.watson.org> <20090802192902.GS47463@elvis.mu.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


On 2 Aug 2009, at 20:29, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> * Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> [090801 15:15] wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>
>>>>> This has slowed down core dumps very significantly.  What used  
>>>>> to take
>>>>> 10-15s on my system now takes around 3 minutes.  A simple test  
>>>>> is to
>>>>> break into ddb and "call doadump" with or without this rev.  I  
>>>>> have a
>>>>> serial console on this machine and so I can use ddb whether the  
>>>>> attached
>>>>> USB keyboard works or not.
>>>
>>> It's because there is a DELAY(1000) in the UKBD's polling routine  
>>> so that
>>> key- repeating will work, no magic.
>>
>> Given a choice between dumping 10x faster and having automatic key  
>> repeat
>> in DDB, I'd lean towards the former.  :-)
>>
>
> Robert, and *@freebsd.org,
>
> Hans should be back in a day or so to address this.  If critical I can
> probably back out the offending code, but I think it makes sense to
> wait a few days more for a more comprehensive fix.

That's my feeling too -- however, I think it would be useful to  
generate a small concept test patch that disables the key repeat  
behavior and see if it restores some/all performance. Scott's argument  
suggests only some, but perhaps we'd get quite a bit, which is what  
we're looking for. We wouldn't commit the patch but it would let us  
know we're on the right track.

Robert


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?134A728D-F2F4-4951-81D8-704CC2DB6F9F>