Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:48:46 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 and multiple interfaces Message-ID: <8765ffiq8x.fsf@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSX.4.58.0401131026060.20724@babelfish.pursued-with.net> (Kevin Stevens's message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:30:19 -0800 (PST)") References: <87hdyzj16w.fsf@strauser.com> <Pine.OSX.4.58.0401131026060.20724@babelfish.pursued-with.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2004-01-13T18:30:19Z, Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net> wri= tes: > If you want them to carry IPv6 traffic. To phrase it differently, you > shouldn't use the same IPv6 address on multiple interfaces, but you don't > have to run IPv6 on all interfaces. Gotcha. OK, back to being on-topic for FreeBSD: how would I assign v6 addresses to those interfaces? I'm running rtadvd on that machine and it's my understanding that sending and accepting advertisements on the same host is a no-no. Should I just give them all static assignments in /etc/rc.conf? And is there any suggested way for "inventing" the addresses for those interfaces? >> "link-local"? Is there a decent (English language) FAQ that's readable >> by technical users who aren't networking experts? > http://www.ipv6.org/ That refers to: > http://www.v6.wide.ad.jp/ ...which does not resolve. :-/ =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBABEuh5sRg+Y0CpvERAsZ8AJ9I9IPEPWGe4fbcfaKOOqbeB9ni5wCfSBuI orKJNo7PQtvx6WHaoMTQx1k= =yMTM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8765ffiq8x.fsf>