Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 01:09:27 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com To: peter@netplex.com.au Cc: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/24307: man page for inetd(8) missing /etc/protocols in FIL ES section Message-ID: <200101150909.BAA02569@spammie.svbug.com> In-Reply-To: <200101150853.f0F8r4Q01821@mobile.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 Jan, Peter Wemm wrote: > opentrax@email.com wrote: >> >> >> On 14 Jan, David Malone wrote: >> > On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 06:57:08PM -0800, opentrax@email.com wrote: >> > >> > Sorry - I closed this PR accidently. I was going to point out that >> > inetd doesn't use /etc/protocols, because it does not have to >> > translate protocol names to protocol numbers. The tokens "tcp", >> > "udp", ... used in inetd.conf are parsed by inetd as it has no >> > need to know any protocol numbers. >> > >> > If this seems OK, then I'll leave the PR closed. >> > >> Can I get a commit on the documentation? >> Even if is has no real use for inetd(8), it should >> be documented becuase it's mentioned. >> This provides consistent style. >> >> Commit and close would be the appropriate action. > > There is no need. There is no point adding a '/etc/protocols' to the FILES > list since inetd does not use the '/etc/protocols' file. At best it would > be misinformation. > Wait. How is this misinformation? I must be missing something. Jessem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101150909.BAA02569>