Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 22:49:55 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu> To: Andrew Reilly <areilly@nsw.bigpond.net.au> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Subject: RE: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI/SDK standards for Ope Message-ID: <0FHV001DFJV1MP@gkar.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <19990909120801.A49847@gurney.reilly.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09-Sep-99 Andrew Reilly wrote: > XFMail isn't acceptable, because I've got 130M of mbox mail > boxes in a deep directory hierarchy, and I'd like to keep them > that way. The last time I looked at XFMail it insisted on an > un-nested mh-directory style of mailbox. Is it still the case? It supports both mbox and mh mailboxes now. --- John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu> -- http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jbaldwin/ PGP Key: http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0FHV001DFJV1MP>