Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:48:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Chris Moerz <freebsd@ny-central.org> To: FreeBSD Virtualization Mailing List <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OS Images(Linux/etc) in ports tree Message-ID: <d4156558-9a22-092e-c984-883710fa0ae9@ny-central.org> In-Reply-To: <CA%2B1FSii3a_%2BH43-8VkxDT%2BpW_tM9b93cW8zYx6bLTmWGmz8heQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAD6yh%2BM_Z_HNcPavt4_TvGn9QhWPX8Q2qU12em3bUkfNXS1WSA@mail.gmail.com> <28dd6abb-5868-e42a-c385-37e72653ba2d@ny-central.org> <bur66nu6ytk7n5nnriwjy2oddrczsk3wse3zjvv2g6giaiohbl@xpbsmba6kp47> <CA%2B1FSii3a_%2BH43-8VkxDT%2BpW_tM9b93cW8zYx6bLTmWGmz8heQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, 29 Jun 2024, Mario Marietto wrote: > I think that it may be possible to put only the VM config files on the ports,not necessarily heavy image files. > You're all making a valid point; I second that - I read the original post as if we're talking about scripts that download images from somewhere else. May have jumped to conclusions. We can probably all agree: OS images do not belong into the ports tree. Porting scripts that handle OS image creation or downloading them from some public repository though would certainly be fine. chrishelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d4156558-9a22-092e-c984-883710fa0ae9>