Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 09:30:15 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> To: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> Cc: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>, ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 36c21f98ff44 - main - benchmarks/ttcp: Update to 1.13 Message-ID: <62olq227lbprjahfkf3l3hgweyujhjiwztavxz3afj5iacof3r@pfc4zh7qor77> In-Reply-To: <CALH631mWdsknMr3ab9Cwkcn-j9ddS%2Bt00_WqpyeiCrHpfpE1cw@mail.gmail.com> References: <202402240847.41O8lN0C026751@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <c3ddafc7035aca09ed4be08afec4baec@mail.infomaniak.com> <CALH631kKRuT89gUqr8mbjNuZ5KUy5wqpSA5hmbY3qbLxxDoxxA@mail.gmail.com> <e6da26b9f5e9efc7a97a553c70e35565@mail.infomaniak.com> <CALH631kRw3zYpOBTBM6mr1Ozrf5LSa2CimaKd3YP4fVP4TTifg@mail.gmail.com> <vihvepbk5lowe2jhfd6tts2rt6tshimet6nezuc5dcyxahfxbg@zhwzl2pwo476> <CALH631mWdsknMr3ab9Cwkcn-j9ddS%2Bt00_WqpyeiCrHpfpE1cw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mlx3l6b3zjxdkwrr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:20:27AM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024, 11:00 Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 03:37:47PM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 3:34=E2=80=AFPM Daniel Engberg
> > > <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > URL(s) for how we fetch releases/archives from Codeberg
> > >
> > > Ah, sorry, I just wasn't aware we're standardizing on this. Out of
> > > curiosity, what's the rationale behind the
> > >
> > "${ACCOUNTNAME}/${PROJECTNAME}/archive/${DISTVERSIONFULL}${EXTRACT_SUFX=
}?dummy=3D/"
> > > form? Why the current form is bad?
> >
> > The rationale with having the ?dummy=3D/ at the end is to trick fetch i=
nto
> > creating a file with a unique name.
> >
> > --
> > Mathieu Arnold
> >
>=20
> I know that, but the change in question does not affect DISTNAME anyways.=
I
> guess, Daniel's concern is about URL components?
The difference is subtle, but right now, the port's distfile is
tag-version.tar.gz, it's a chance that tag =3D portname. The port should
be made more standard to make it more resilient against future changes.
--=20
Mathieu Arnold
--mlx3l6b3zjxdkwrr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=AMbN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mlx3l6b3zjxdkwrr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62olq227lbprjahfkf3l3hgweyujhjiwztavxz3afj5iacof3r>