Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Mar 2000 18:39:59 +0100 (CET)
From:      Dominik Brettnacher <domi@saargate.de>
To:        "paul@originative.co.uk" <paul@originative.co.uk>
Cc:        brian@awfulhak.org, jabley@patho.gen.nz, dom@happygiraffe.net, nik@freebsd.org, lee@uk.freebsd.org, freebsd-users@uk.freebsd.org, brian@hak.lan.awfulhak.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ispsetup (was: Re: FreeBSD in Dixons)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003141838460.2005-100000@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <fc.579eec2b579eec2b3d778b103b9aca00.2b2824@saargate.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, paul@originative.co.uk wrote:

> I think it would be better to keep ISP information bundled together so
> that third-party contibutors, such as the ISP themselves can easily
> submit updated information.
> 
> i.e.
> 
> isp/demon
> isp/demon/uk
> isp/demon/nl

I think you could do both by using symbolical links. Something like CPAN
with their "by-name", "by-author" and "by-module"-structure.

-- 
Dominik - http://www.brettnacher.org/users/dominik/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003141838460.2005-100000>