Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:53:44 -0800 From: Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "dangerously dedicated" Message-ID: <38D99548.3201BC6D@gorean.org> References: <14552.57732.739752.665443@onceler.kcilink.com> <4.3.2.20000321160347.00ad9b20@207.227.119.2> <Your message of "Sun, 19 Mar 2000 12:26:20 EST." <38D50DBC.88FA8E4D@glue.umd.edu> <38D50DBC.88FA8E4D@glue.umd.edu> <38D3AB72.366D851D@glue.umd.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003151354390.1980-100000@dt051n0b.san.rr.com> <200003152159.OAA89926@harmony.village.org> <38D03E64.3D17FC34@glue.umd.edu> <200003190433.VAA04863@harmony.village.org> <200003212255.PAA26291@harmony.village.org> <200003222301.QAA34410@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh wrote:
> I didn't say that using da0a is stupid. I said using dangerously
> dedicated mode is stupid. Based on the number of times I've shot
> myself in the foot trying to use dangaerously dedicated devices over
> the years, I'll never use them again.
I'm curious, what kind of problems have you had, and how is using the
compatability slice an improvement? I've always used "dangerously
dedicated" on my freebsd-only disks, and I've never had a problem.
Not disagreeing, just curious,
Doug
--
"So, the cows were part of a dream that dreamed itself into
existence,
is that possible?" asked the student incredulously.
The master simply replied, "Mu."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38D99548.3201BC6D>