Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:14:26 -0800 From: "Chris H." <chris#@1command.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does FBSD always assume it's on an 8080 CPU? Message-ID: <20070126191426.md1bqabhusksckcs@webmail.1command.com> In-Reply-To: <45BABDBF.2090601@andric.com> References: <20070126171218.2k25n1tt28c08wow@webmail.1command.com> <45BABDBF.2090601@andric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>: > Chris H. wrote: >> I've noticed building kernels, that since v. >= 5 that during >> the phase 2/3 all the lines echoed to the screen contain: >> -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 ... > > See /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf. Sigh, the obvious is so /easily/ overlooked. Thanks for the "heads-up". :) That helps quite alot. --Chris > > >> As Pentium have been the "norm" for many years now, why aren't >> these /assumed/? > > Because i486 is still the lowest common denominator, at least for 6.x. > > >> Default? hmmm... not as far as I can tell. Anyway, I would *greatly* >> appreciate any insight on this issue. Do I need to pollute my make.conf >> file to achive a Pentium kernel? > > Yes. Is this so horrible? > > -- panic: kernel trap (ignored) ----------------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p12 (SMP - 900x2) Tue Mar 7 19:37:23 PST 2006 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070126191426.md1bqabhusksckcs>