Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:14:21 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> To: blue <susan.lan@zyxel.com.tw> Cc: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net>, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current round of IPsec checkins complete... Message-ID: <20070703141421.0bb9741b@localhost> In-Reply-To: <4689B5CF.80702@zyxel.com.tw> References: <m2tzso72a9.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <20070703005147.4427314f@localhost> <20070702145725.U31116@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20070703011627.5f3b8863@localhost> <20070702153105.GA27761@zen.inc> <20070703104831.26dba9bc@localhost> <4689B5CF.80702@zyxel.com.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:34:55 +0800
blue <susan.lan@zyxel.com.tw> wrote:
> What is the main enhancement for the commit?
Hi Susan,
please check the archives of net@ for several emails discussing this.
>
> Tracing back the discussion, It is all about NAT-T?
no, I only just brought this up.
>
> How is the FAST_IPSEC for IPv6?
check the archives :)
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070703141421.0bb9741b>