Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:14:21 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> To: blue <susan.lan@zyxel.com.tw> Cc: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net>, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current round of IPsec checkins complete... Message-ID: <20070703141421.0bb9741b@localhost> In-Reply-To: <4689B5CF.80702@zyxel.com.tw> References: <m2tzso72a9.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <20070703005147.4427314f@localhost> <20070702145725.U31116@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20070703011627.5f3b8863@localhost> <20070702153105.GA27761@zen.inc> <20070703104831.26dba9bc@localhost> <4689B5CF.80702@zyxel.com.tw>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:34:55 +0800
blue <susan.lan@zyxel.com.tw> wrote:
> What is the main enhancement for the commit?
Hi Susan,
please check the archives of net@ for several emails discussing this.
>
> Tracing back the discussion, It is all about NAT-T?
no, I only just brought this up.
>
> How is the FAST_IPSEC for IPv6?
check the archives :)
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070703141421.0bb9741b>