Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 09:39:04 +0930 From: Tim Aslat <tim@spyderweb.com.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: drivers Message-ID: <20050530093904.232a6ae1@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20050529231226.GK61821@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <BAY21-F21EF3AB9ACF3077B2F01C0DA000@phx.gbl> <20050529231226.GK61821@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 30 May 2005 08:42:26 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Nowhere is a good place to send 10 MB of illegible log output. Please > don't. I agree. > Do you really expect people to read this? It's incorrectly coded, and > it's far too long. Many people pay for their mail; you have cost me > personally $2.00 to download this message. Knowing what kind of setup you have Greg, I can believe that. Although it has opened up a rather large can of worms. Can the list maintainers restrict message sizes to less than a meg? I honestly can't imagine any possible reason for sending an attachment larger than 500K (shar files, etc) to a public mailing list. Is it worth looking into doing this, or am I barking up the wrong metaphor? Regards Tim -- Tim Aslat <tim@spyderweb.com.au> Spyderweb Consulting http://www.spyderweb.com.au Phone: +61 8 84193434 Mobile: +61 0401088479
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050530093904.232a6ae1>