Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:02:26 -0800 From: "Peter A. Giessel" <pgiessel@mac.com> To: girishvenkatachalam@gmail.com, FreeBSD-questions <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What's so compelling about FreeBSD? Message-ID: <45356102.5030604@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20061017224847.GA14477@lakshmi.susmita.org> References: <af8b40ce0610151526h6aba1785mb77eb2a76e69fdfa@mail.gmail.com> <80f4f2b20610151556l18c5adcci4196ab107b6b9907@mail.gmail.com> <4533C553.3040609@schrodinger.com> <20061017135829.GA56234@gothmog.pc> <a969fbd10610170813s4c64bb3exd3689b626ef14556@mail.gmail.com> <20061017153004.M88574@envieweb.net> <453512C8.4030900@schrodinger.com> <20061017224847.GA14477@lakshmi.susmita.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006/10/17 14:48, Girish Venkatachalam seems to have typed: > But there is no gainsaying the fact that at least my hardware is > supported albeit buggily or ineffectively... I don't mean to be rude, but if hardware support is your only criteria, why not just run Windows? If you don't care that its buggy or ineffective, and you don't want to check that it is supported before you buy it, you just want it to support everything, it would seem to me that Microsoft's OS is the obvious choice....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45356102.5030604>