Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:35:30 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts print-cdrom-packages.sh Message-ID: <3FCAB702.4040603@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20031201032205.GA41354@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200311292348.hATNmi50060667@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031201032205.GA41354@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:48:44PM -0800, Scott Long wrote: > >>scottl 2003/11/29 15:48:44 PST >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> release/scripts print-cdrom-packages.sh >> Log: >> vim-lite can hardly be considered 'lite'. Remove it. > > > Why isn't it "lite"? > -rw-r--r-- 1 portmgr archive 2M Nov 18 01:09 vim-lite-6.2.139.tbz > > Lets look at the Emacs editors you left behind: > -rw-r--r-- 1 portmgr archive 11M Nov 21 17:21 emacs-21.3.tbz > > I predict you will become very unpopular for this commit. > Please remove Emacs instead. > I think that you failed to see that there was both 'vim' and 'vim-lite'. In the interest of saving space, one needed to go. I'm happy to discuss which of the two is more appropriate, but I'm adamant that I will remain silent on an emacs v. vi debate.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FCAB702.4040603>