Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 20:45:43 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: Vincent Poy <vince@mail.MCESTATE.COM>, David Nugent <davidn@labs.usn.blaze.net.au>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: termcap question Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970428204444.1082A-100000@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <19970428011900.36864@hydrogen.nike.efn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > would anybody object to making tset understand the convention that > termcap(5) mentions about -n being number of lines? i.e. you don't have > to have a definition for cons-30, but tset will see the -30 and > automaticly set the rows to 30?? that would simplify and eliminate > entries that are currently duplicated... (cons25, cons30, cons43, cons50, > and cons60 are greate examples of this) I don't think it worse to do it, we need to keep multiply entries for other (non-FreeBSD) machines in any case. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970428204444.1082A-100000>