Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:08:24 -0700
From:      "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To:        Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp
Message-ID:  <4E817B3C-6524-4F7F-943C-8C707BCED610@hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <753914397.1123782.1366844549491.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
References:  <753914397.1123782.1366844549491.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 2013-04-24, at 16:02 , Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote:

>> 
> Along with rsize,wsize you might want to try increasing readahead. The
> default is only 1.

Stupid question on this, possibly, but are the current defaults "sane" anymore, or residual from 'the old days'?   Like, I've read in many places where you should raise rsize/wsize … in what circumstances would leaving as the defaults make sense?







Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E817B3C-6524-4F7F-943C-8C707BCED610>