Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:26:14 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for non i386/amd64 testers for tmpfs Message-ID: <46A76B96.4080507@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <50002.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1185310553.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> References: <46A625FB.5050105@delphij.net> <50002.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1185310553.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Björn König wrote: > Xin LI wrote: > >> I'd like to request that some owners of non-i386/amd64 boxes to test >> sys/modules/tmpfs and report if it would work correctly on other >> architectures, [...] > > I built and used the module on arm architecture without problems. The > board has 64 MB RAM and 512 MB swap via NFS. I ran the bonnie benchmark on > that filesystem with a 256 MB test file successfully. Thanks! > Do you want a certain scenario to be tested? More comprehensive testing would be appreciated, but I think I have a good reason enabling the module build on arm :-) Cheers,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46A76B96.4080507>