Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 20:03:00 -0800 From: Jonathan Mini <j_mini@efn.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: Jacques Vidrine <n@nectar.com>, dnelson@emsphone.com, j_mini@efn.org, AdamT@smginc.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Config datafile... Message-ID: <19971212200300.57580@micron.mini.net> In-Reply-To: <199712130041.RAA19766@usr04.primenet.com>; from Terry Lambert on Sat, Dec 13, 1997 at 12:41:12AM %2B0000 References: <199712130006.SAA00398@kai.communique.net> <199712130041.RAA19766@usr04.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> stands accused of saying: > > Instead of reinventing Windows 3.1 .INI files, why down't we just > jump straight to reinventing the the Windows 95 registry? I'm looking for a long-term solution here. Once I write this, I don't want to have to touch it again forever. Perhaps we should follow what I said before and start talking about the STRUCTURE we want rather than the way we write it down in a file. Terry? I'd like one of those ten page documents about what we need here. :) > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. -- Jonathan Mini Ingenious Productions Software Development P.O. Box 5693, Eugene, Or. 97405 "A child of five could understand this! Quick -- Fetch me a child of five."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971212200300.57580>