Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 23:13:23 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: APU2C4 information (was Re: 11.0-RC2 and 12-CURRENT won't boot on apu2c4) Message-ID: <20160903231323.79d082c5.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=qDFfeGXtA0GcK3zu%2BjX74q7PoMtEQ=ovmEhdfcwfkHQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <f764e89a-e6bc-e34c-54d8-1e1c1f50b6fc@posteo.de> <bad1b6d0-e581-10eb-b904-109b3a678318@FreeBSD.org> <1472900114.23139.2.camel@posteo.de> <7CC5E580-10DC-4688-B6CE-8C1337EC227B@freebsd.org> <be5f2a11-edba-697e-4428-8c0d35f3feba@madpilot.net> <FC008017-D203-4CD8-A071-B9187DC62395@fh-muenster.de> <20160903151100.6e375bed.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <51989ee8-d2dc-4249-cea9-5d9d7cf793ef@madpilot.net> <20160903153637.138e2d39.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CAJ-Vmo=qDFfeGXtA0GcK3zu%2BjX74q7PoMtEQ=ovmEhdfcwfkHQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Am Sat, 3 Sep 2016 13:38:14 -0700 Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> schrieb: > hi, > > no, ar988x is 11ac, and i haven't finished the port. > > > -a > But anyway it is a nice ring to my eyes/ears to see/read, that you're working on it ;-) My thank you in advance! Kind regards, Oliver > > On 3 September 2016 at 06:36, O. Hartmann <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > Am Sat, 3 Sep 2016 15:25:17 +0200 > > Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> schrieb: > > > >> On 09/03/16 15:11, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> > Am Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:01:15 +0200 > >> > Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> schrieb: > >> > > >> >>> On 03 Sep 2016, at 13:24, Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> On 09/03/16 13:08, Michael Tuexen wrote: > >> >>>>> On 03 Sep 2016, at 12:55, Oliver Böttcher <oliver.boettcher@posteo.de> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Am Freitag, den 02.09.2016, 22:09 +0200 schrieb Guido Falsi: > >> >>>>>> I think you should open a bug report and post the number here so > >> >>>>>> feedback about this can be collected there. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Bug report filed [1]. I just noticed that the serial console is not > >> >>>>> working on >=11.0 > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> The update from 10.3 to 11.0 worked but has no output opon boot in > >> >>>>> 11.0. > >> >>>> I'm running FreeBSD head on an apu2c4 without any problems, the serial > >> >>>> console is working. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> However, I do have > >> >>>> > >> >>>> console="comconsole" > >> >>>> comconsole_speed="115200" > >> >>>> > >> >>>> in /boot/loader.conf. > >> >>>> It is not using ZFS and it is booting from an m-SATA SSD. Which boot device > >> >>>> are you using? > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> SO it looks like a default configuration issue. > >> >>> > >> >>> This can explain why my custom nanobsd images work, I have a console > >> >>> configuration in loader there. > >> >> The default console speed of the apu2 is 115200, the one from FreeBSD isn't. > >> >> Without the above setting you have to use 115200 first to see the BIOS output > >> >> and than change the speed to whatever FreeBSD uses as its default. Using > >> >> the above settings you can use the same speed for both. > >> >> > >> >> Best regards > >> >> Michael > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > >> >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> >> > >> > > >> > I do not want to "kidnap/threadnap" the thread, but I have a question: My APU 2C4 > >> > is underway and I'm curious about whether it would boot via UEFI or not? > >> > >> I don't think it has UEFI support. These boards come with a traditional > >> old style BIOS. > > > > All right. It is coreboot, if not mistaken and I read something about a UEFI support > > there, but forgot whether this is futural agenda or real by now. > > > >> > >> > > >> > I also ordered mine with a Atheros AR9882 based WiFi card and I'm also curious > >> > about whether this chip is working with 12-CURRENT or not. The AR9880, more > >> > powerful and newer, seems also available for this APU, but it is more expensive > >> > and I didn't took the risc ... > > > > I checked the WiFi webpage at FreeBSD.org and these specific adapters are not > > mentioned there. The support of AP capable WiFi adapters is rather limited (to > > Atheros types), on Linux, more adapters seem to provide the AP functionality. > > Therefore, my question. > >> > >> I don't know this device. Atheros cards have very good support in > >> general through the ath(4) driver, if you know the PCI ID of the device > >> you can check in the sources if it's known. > >> > > I'll check and report back ;-) > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > Oliver > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXyzzzAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8YsQH/1v8vVIYIszTFJwfROrshRDM uWP9atT23hA431gW5CdxHzCfdRb1zUPTLig0jTQfeEr8PyKudqMQfJ+NF/qtOrIJ AnV5CQqQU1bdD1tHuQcSztWlfMkb5JENBf+TUg9GJsyRKkJ0gOtme+qrDIN7115U z6ZK7zmbxg/O8gS5QwZwQd5iErY0V4SHADAUTibB7fMLLrobNi11hRexNBSsfgat KDjYBV0/DApCHbHsM6/A3WLCSehi8t2d87gYdXlu4yvIARxfmc7cTpTrz8/dbh1W gFPAlk8JJicqh7qWxgTT7lg49r+2ncOg3kjPz9hGeBUiUMPcdLn0CsJas5MrI0s= =NaJf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160903231323.79d082c5.ohartman>