Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:02:41 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu> To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast Message-ID: <426D14A1.9080707@t-hosting.hu> In-Reply-To: <20050425160146.4795fe1b.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> References: <20050424175543.71041.qmail@web51805.mail.yahoo.com> <20050424151517.O68772@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050425000459.GA28667@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424204611.072105a0@64.7.153.2> <20050425010242.GA44110@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424210422.03d22990@64.7.153.2> <20050425014453.GA59981@xor.obsecurity.org> <426C6B1D.3040704@elischer.org> <20050425061459.GA33247@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050425062106.GB91852@voodoo.oberon.net> <426CF3DE.4000409@samsco.org> <20050425160146.4795fe1b.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Definitely not for 6.0, and I usually avoid .0 releases on critical >software, but nonetheless it would interesting setting a tinderbox, >launch a buildworld process with gcc40 and see where/if it breaks. I >have a spare k6-2 box I could setup for that task. > > > What about installing gcc40 port to an alternative location and testing it with changing the CC, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS macros so that make uses that version of gcc? I'm compiling the new gcc now, I'm interested in the result...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?426D14A1.9080707>