Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 17:46:29 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@freebie.dcfinc.com> To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: chad@dcfinc.com, nate@mt.sri.com, rkw@dataplex.net, brian@awfulhak.org, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version Resolution? Message-ID: <199711210046.RAA04475@freebie.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <199711210040.RAA12221@mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Nov 20, 97 05:40:18 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > But there are (can be) seperate copies of newvers.sh in each branch? > > Seems it would be an administrative procedure to touch it correctly as > > part of creating a new branch. How often does that happen? Couple of > > times a year? > > More than that, but as I stated before, file corruption even *once* > isn't acceptable. The number of problems that will occur when a branch > occurs (and everyone and his dog decides to finally download things) > means that the # of questions due to bogus files is now bigger than the > number of questions solved by implementing the solution. I'm obviously ignorant of the discussions you had with Richard. Can you explain the "file corruption" you imagine? -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL22) Brother, can you paradigm? 602-953-1392 chad@dcfinc.com chad@anasazi.com crl22@aol.com DCF, Inc. - 14523 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711210046.RAA04475>