Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:30:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus Message-ID: <200310101630.h9AGUEjS088866@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:20:29 +0300 On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:00:51PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > [...] > > > >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386 > > > > It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something > > this trivial to a past release branch? The GENERIC config file > > explains what devices require miibus(4). So does the handbook, > > and the LINT file. > > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9. Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'? What Tom is saying is that the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents that ed needs miibus. I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section. This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th, committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If this sentence were in Chinese, it would say something else.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310101630.h9AGUEjS088866>