Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:30:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus Message-ID: <200310101630.h9AGUEjS088866@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:20:29 +0300 On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:00:51PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > [...] > > > >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386 > > > > It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something > > this trivial to a past release branch? The GENERIC config file > > explains what devices require miibus(4). So does the handbook, > > and the LINT file. > > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9. Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'? What Tom is saying is that the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents that ed needs miibus. I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section. This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th, committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If this sentence were in Chinese, it would say something else.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310101630.h9AGUEjS088866>