Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:24:57 -0400
From:      Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org>
To:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: USB stick and some help with it.
Message-ID:  <68328CAF-A3BF-4BBE-AAC5-0783211435DD@kraus-haus.org>
In-Reply-To: <573761DA-A954-424A-998D-AD59204D4D79@kraus-haus.org>
References:  <55BF6AA0.2030802@bananmonarki.se> <55BF8824.9050803@gmail.com> <55BF8D65.6010404@bananmonarki.se> <55BF9024.6000409@gmail.com> <55BF9522.3@bananmonarki.se> <55BF964B.7080400@gmail.com> <55BF9817.4070409@bananmonarki.se> <55BF9954.2020005@gmail.com> <55BF9F26.8030003@bananmonarki.se> <55BF9FE3.3030606@gmail.com> <55BFA0BB.5080704@bananmonarki.se> <573761DA-A954-424A-998D-AD59204D4D79@kraus-haus.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 3, 2015, at 13:19, Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org> wrote:

> An ls -l on my 10.1-RELEASE-p10 systems shows disk devices as =
character special (=93raw=94) and does not show any block special =
devices.

In fact, a find / -type b yields no results on this system, so I can =
only assume there are no non-raw devices=85 While a find / -type c =
yields the expected list of devices.

I come from the Solaris world and _not_ having both =93raw=94 (c) and =
=93cooked=94 (b) devices seems odd to me at first glance, but I suppose =
it makes sense.

--
Paul Kraus
paul@kraus-haus.org




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?68328CAF-A3BF-4BBE-AAC5-0783211435DD>