Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 08:13:56 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r334363 - head/usr.bin/elfdump Message-ID: <CAPyFy2B9v%2B4nf8eaR4sGh_PG1jw=y2HNgbsqLCt_v=rDOxmi3A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20180530121015.mpdt6gh45kyriciv@mutt-hbsd> References: <201805300116.w4U1GoWj090163@repo.freebsd.org> <20180530121015.mpdt6gh45kyriciv@mutt-hbsd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 May 2018 at 08:10, Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org> wrote: > > I wonder if it would be a good idea to handle .note.ABI-tag and > .note.tag so that it can handle binaries compiled both before and > after r232832. As I said in the commit message, elfdump's note parsing needs a bunch of rework. r232832 was years ago and today I think it's much more likely that if elfdump encounters a .note.ABI-tag section that's going to be a GNU note (that will be misinterpreted) than one from a years-old FreeBSD binary.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2B9v%2B4nf8eaR4sGh_PG1jw=y2HNgbsqLCt_v=rDOxmi3A>