Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:11:20 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r198868 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 i386/i386 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0911041610500.6797@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10911040804p6419778bgc363951104adb76e@mail.gmail.com> References: <200911040132.nA41WxtQ012750@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0911041506220.6797@fledge.watson.org> <3bbf2fe10911040804p6419778bgc363951104adb76e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Attilio Rao wrote: >> I think the warning is a good idea, but I don't think we should include the >> URL. We have no control over where it points or what information it will >> contain in the future. Is there a hardware vendor errata number/document >> that we can point at instead, or alternatively, can we just leave it with >> the first warning line? > > I tried to look for an errata pdf from AMD, but I've been unable to locate > one and that's the only 'close' reference I could find. I'm fine with > stripping the link, through, I actually wasn't very eager to add it, I just > did for a complete reference. I'm fine with it in a source comment, just not sure about kernel output. Robert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0911041610500.6797>