Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:34:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> To: "A. L. Meyers" <a.l.meyers@consult-meyers.com> Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is "stable" "stable"? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107230829520.74787-100000@snafu.adept.org> In-Reply-To: <20010723140335.S99402-100000@localhost.consult-meyers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, A. L. Meyers wrote: > do you suggest that if someone wants "stable-stable" not just > "stable" he should cvsup RELENG_4_3 instead of RELENG_4? I suggest you spend half the time reading documentation and trying to actually understand the FreeBSD build hierarchy you do posting messages here about what 'stable' is and/or what -STABLE should be called. (No offense, but this thread is a dead horse. If you'd take a few seconds to search past list archives, you'd already know that.) Later, -Mike -- Log analysis mailing list: http://www.adept.org/mailinglists.html#logwatchers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0107230829520.74787-100000>