Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:58:18 +0200 From: Rick van der Zwet <info@rickvanderzwet.nl> To: "Luiz Gustavo S. Costa" <lgcosta@pfsense.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: udav: vendor 0x0fe6, product: 0x9700 Message-ID: <BANLkTimaiqbn4V9=HYnkmAw7xcDBJVYU=g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=1iHxBj-5zkbCj7Ab50m1__aAUTg@mail.gmail.com> References: <BANLkTi=siZJmpxveD201PrFt3XPb%2BCNMFQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=1iHxBj-5zkbCj7Ab50m1__aAUTg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 June 2011 14:17, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa <lgcosta@pfsense.org> wrote:
> I'm trying to add a new product id [1] to the driver udav and am
> having a little trouble.
>
> At first, this is similar to id 0x8180 and there should be no
> problems, but I still can not get a PHY for it.
Assuming you mean 0x8181 --looking at your patch-- How do you know
they have similar chip-sets? Can you get the full interface
description list for both to see if they have the same endpoints:
usbconfig dump_all_config_desc
> Can someone help me?
...
>About adapter:
> [1] http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br/~lgcosta/jp1080/
Looking at the picture these kind of USB dongles (various chipsets)
tend to die. I suspect the build quality is not that great. Just
checking you did check it the device is functioning properly using the
official (linux) drivers?
Br. /Rick
--
http://rickvanderzwet.nl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTimaiqbn4V9=HYnkmAw7xcDBJVYU=g>