Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:36:38 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: kostikbel@gmail.com Cc: xcllnt@mac.com, mips@FreeBSD.org, tinderbox@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips Message-ID: <20090218.143638.-1025539642.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20090218200023.GU41617@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20090217.235826.-1697751865.imp@bsdimp.com> <BE046876-F8EF-4269-9CD6-743483EC1869@mac.com> <20090218200023.GU41617@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20090218200023.GU41617@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> writes:
: I have a question. All architectures I had a slightest interest in,
: included the required alignment of types into the ABI specification.
: This is true at least for i386. amd64, sparc v8 and v9, and HP-PA 1.1
: and 2.0.
:
: Is MIPS different in this aspect ?
MIPS does define it as well. I have all the old o32 docs, but have
had trouble locating the n32/n64 docs since they were done by SGI and
SGI is now defunct. I know MIPS Technologies has information on nubi,
which is yet another ABI family aimed more at the embedded platforms,
but it hasn't had much traction.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090218.143638.-1025539642.imp>