Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:36:38 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: kostikbel@gmail.com Cc: xcllnt@mac.com, mips@FreeBSD.org, tinderbox@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips Message-ID: <20090218.143638.-1025539642.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20090218200023.GU41617@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20090217.235826.-1697751865.imp@bsdimp.com> <BE046876-F8EF-4269-9CD6-743483EC1869@mac.com> <20090218200023.GU41617@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message: <20090218200023.GU41617@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> writes:
: I have a question. All architectures I had a slightest interest in,
: included the required alignment of types into the ABI specification.
: This is true at least for i386. amd64, sparc v8 and v9, and HP-PA 1.1
: and 2.0.
:
: Is MIPS different in this aspect ?
MIPS does define it as well. I have all the old o32 docs, but have
had trouble locating the n32/n64 docs since they were done by SGI and
SGI is now defunct. I know MIPS Technologies has information on nubi,
which is yet another ABI family aimed more at the embedded platforms,
but it hasn't had much traction.
Warner
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090218.143638.-1025539642.imp>