Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:16:08 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loosing spam fight Message-ID: <20070127041608.GG927@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200701260924.59674.joao@matik.com.br> References: <8a20e5000701240903q35b89e14k1ab977df62411784@mail.gmail.com> <200701250828.50540.joao@matik.com.br> <87ac074537.fsf@thingy.datadok.no> <200701260924.59674.joao@matik.com.br>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, 2007-Jan-26 09:24:58 -0200, JoaoBR wrote: >like I said, for my understandings firewall implemention for spam fighting is >wrong > >because you reject the message Except that the original mail was talking about greylisting. This won't reject any mail sent from a MTA that correctly implements SMTP. According to the SMTP specs, I am perfectly at liberty to tell you that I can't accept your mail right now, please try again later. -- Peter Jeremy [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFutII/opHv/APuIcRAgtbAKCG6f7m9MtyZc4GY5CA0ORugyzpHgCgv7+Q HEUJUYRRxZmOev++B573GYc= =BEPr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070127041608.GG927>