Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 9 Aug 2003 11:44:45 -0700
From:      David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>
To:        "Alan L. Cox" <alc@imimic.com>
Cc:        cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sys_process.c
Message-ID:  <20030809184445.GA24746@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F353BF5.2C4A5F3B@imimic.com>
References:  <200308091801.h79I1JHC036853@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030809181926.GA24480@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <3F353BF5.2C4A5F3B@imimic.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003, Alan L. Cox wrote:
> David Schultz wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, Aug 09, 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> > >   A solution is to use vm_page_hold() in place of vm_page_wire().  Held
> > >   pages can be freed.  They are moved to a special hold queue until the
> >           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >   hold is released.
> > 
> > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you mean ``cannot be freed''.
> 
> Nope.  It is correct as written.  Take a look at vm_page_free_toq() and
> vm_page_unhold().

Bleh.  The third sentence that I quoted actually makes it crystal
clear what freeing means in this context.  Sorry.

/me wanders down to Peet's to get some coffee.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030809184445.GA24746>