Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:25:48 -0500 From: Benjamin Kaduk <bjkfbsd@gmail.com> To: Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org> Cc: "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r297185 - head/lib/libthr/thread Message-ID: <CAJ5_RoBu0pP%2B3S9gUkkEj2-oiay%2BF0KN2u=h3rMCFKbQUJx_6w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201603221051.u2MAphFa074523@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201603221051.u2MAphFa074523@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: kib > Date: Tue Mar 22 10:51:42 2016 > New Revision: 297185 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/297185 > > Log: > Apparently there are some popular programs around which assume that it > is safe to call pthread_mutex_init() on the same shared mutex several > times. POSIX claims that the behaviour in this case is undefined. > Has anyone volunteered to tell KDE they're doing it wrong? (Do we know of anything other than KDE?) -Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ5_RoBu0pP%2B3S9gUkkEj2-oiay%2BF0KN2u=h3rMCFKbQUJx_6w>