Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:11:30 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sys/conf/newvers.sh vs. subversion-1.7 Message-ID: <4EA21842.5000808@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAG=rPVfD8EZYpD_SQES2%2B9uUeqGOaAhW3asJbVeGKeV3er2ZKw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111020114844.GK59810@albert.catwhisker.org> <20111020122121.GL59810@albert.catwhisker.org> <201110211636.05917.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111021211221.GV59810@albert.catwhisker.org> <CAG=rPVfD8EZYpD_SQES2%2B9uUeqGOaAhW3asJbVeGKeV3er2ZKw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/21/2011 17:51, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Can you come up with a patch which invoke "svn info ." (if the svn > binary exists)? > This is slightly faster than svnversion. > > If "svn info ." doesn't error out, you can assume that the directory > is under SVN control. Doesn't svnversion error out pretty quickly in the same circumstance? My brief testing seems to indicate that it does. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EA21842.5000808>