Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 20:46:45 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch(1) depends on RCS - should it? Message-ID: <815.1381178805@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgni6kw6qtLMwWQdc2SuQp%2BWa5-pTQwgSbTPa1-x_vznEA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgni6kw6qtLMwWQdc2SuQp%2BWa5-pTQwgSbTPa1-x_vznEA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <CAF6rxgni6kw6qtLMwWQdc2SuQp+Wa5-pTQwgSbTPa1-x_vznEA@mail.gmail.com> , Eitan Adler writes: >patch(1) explicitly tries to use RCS (and SCCS) in certain cases. Are >we okay with a base system utility that behaves differently depending >on whether a port is installed? Should the relevant code be removed >from patch(1)? > >See head/usr.bin/patch/inp.c lines 166 to 240 for details. Yes, that code should be removed. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?815.1381178805>